Calphalon Simply Calphalon Nonstick Hard-Anodized Aluminum 3-Quart Chef's Skillet

Calphalon Simply Calphalon Nonstick Hard-Anodized Aluminum 3-Quart Chef's SkilletThis is the best skillet we have ever used for high heat usage.It conducts heat evenly in all areas, is heavy, substantal fry pan (similar to cast iron) without the downside rusting, sticking etc.Even though it is not advertised as non-stick, we have had no problem with sticking, without the problems of tefelon scratching and flakes coming off the surface during high heat use.We plan to replace other pans with Calphalon in the future if this one continues to provide the service indicated. Review based on 1 month of hard usage.

The description for this item suggests that its interior is hard anodized. It is, in fact, NON-STICK. As a non-stick pan, it's halfway decent, but I bought it presuming that it was a steal-of-a-deal hard anodized interior like the other Calphalon I own.

Considering what I paid, I will keep it, but I'm disappointed that it wasn't what I ordered.

Buy Calphalon Simply Calphalon Nonstick Hard-Anodized Aluminum 3-Quart Chef's Skillet Now



Much smaller and lighter than I expected. I own a set of Calphalon andall pieces are very heavy. It's like another reviewer indicated, its non-stick, not hard anodized. Price was right and probably not work sending back. I'll decide whether to keep or re-gift.

Read Best Reviews of Calphalon Simply Calphalon Nonstick Hard-Anodized Aluminum 3-Quart Chef's Skillet Here

I got this as a gift. I own regular Calphalon, which is made heavier, this is called Simply Calphalon, a little less heavy, but just as good. Thats why it is priced less. Well worth buying more.

Want Calphalon Simply Calphalon Nonstick Hard-Anodized Aluminum 3-Quart Chef's Skillet Discount?

This would be a great pan if they left off the teflon coating.Nowhere in the ad is it mentioned that it is teflon.or at least it didn't when I ordered.So they take a pan that should last nearly forever and coat it so that it will last a year or two, maybe.

0 comments:

Post a Comment